Wood County Jury Rules in favor of a local neurosurgeon in a medical professional liability claim
A Wood County jury recently found against a plaintiff and in favor of a local neurosurgeon in a medical professional liability claim. After a four-day trial, the jury found that the neurosurgeon did not fail to act as a reasonably prudent neurosurgeon in performing a cervical laminectomy and fusion on the plaintiff patient. The plaintiff had alleged that the neurosurgeon’s performance of her cervical surgery caused her permanent neurological injury, loss of enjoyment of life, and a complete inability to engage in employment activities. The jury rejected the plaintiff’s claims and found that the neurosurgeon acted within the standard of care in his treatment of the plaintiff.
The defendant neurosurgeon was represented by Flaherty attorneys Ted Martin and Luke Schmitt.
Disclaimer: Case summaries, reports of past results and individual lawyer biographies on this website describe past matters handled for clients of the firm. These descriptions are meant only to provide information to the public about the activities and experience of our lawyers. They are not intended as a guarantee that the same or similar results can be obtained in every matter undertaken by our lawyers. You must not assume that a similar result can be obtained in a legal matter of interest to you. The outcome of a particular matter can depend on a variety of factors—including the specific factual and legal circumstances, the ability of opposing counsel, and, often, unexpected developments beyond the control of any client or lawyer.
